SOA in Action Blog

Joe McKendrick

Podcast: Measuring SOA Success -- By the Ton

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

There are a bunch of ways to measure SOA success -- development hours spent on projects, speed of new product rollouts, deferred enterprise application upgrades, cost savings by switching from live customer service to self-service Web access.

But one company found a different way to gauge the progress of its SOA efforts -- by the reduced tonnage of the servers and infrastructure in its data center. "They calculated that by the time they were finished with their new SOA initiative, they would have eliminated six tons of iron in their data center!" observes Oracle VP and chief technologist Dave Chappell. I recently spoke to Dave to explore SOA ROI and other pertinent matters as part of our podcast series connected to the recent InfoWorld Executive Forum. (Download podcast file here.)

Dave keynoted the Forum with a discussion on how grid computing supports SOA scalability.

In the podcast, Dave discussed how companies can go about measuring ROI as they launch their own SOA endeavors. "It's usually about eliminating redundant systems -- that's the first place where folks start," he explains. "And then, the emphasis shifts to being able to go after new markets and so forth."

SOA metrics such as reduced hardware and IT cost reduction are relatively straightforward, but wider business benefits are more of a challenge to capture and measure, Dave says. "There's much less, much less of a tangible benefit and usually it takes a broader effort across the company to be able to measure. So that's a little harder but, you know, in the next year or so, we'll start to see more of those, where businesses are actually measuring how they are able to grow, based on the adoption of SOA."

Beyond ROI, the landscape is changing in terms of what companies want from SOA adoption. A few years ago, the industry focused largely on basic infrastructure and how to define service enablement. The discussion shifted to enterprise service buses and process orchestration.

Now the big challenge is how to address the necessary support functions to build out flexible, automated business processes to support SOA initiatives. Event-driven architecture and complex event processing are among those accompanying technologies, Dave explained.

As part of this fall's SOA Executive Forum, InfoWorld, in cooperation with ebizQ, has published a special supplement on SOA: Building a Foundation for Continuous Change. The report features interviews with the industry's top practitioners to reveal the best practices, customer case studies and industry surveys that you can use to transform you tactical SOA systems into the right strategic mix of governance, and integration with complementary technologies like BPM that will increase the depths and directions of your business agility.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.ebizq.net/MT4/mt-tb.cgi/11676

Leave a comment

SOA in Action Blog

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an author and independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. View more

Subscribe



Subscribe in Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add ebizQ's SOA in Action Blog to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Add to Google

Recently Commented On

Tag Cloud

Accenture, Active Endpoints, AlignSpace, Amazon Web Services, amazon web services, AmberPoint, Anne Thomas Manes, Apache, Apache Project, Association for Enterprise Information, automated decision making, Bank of America, Brenda Michelson, business activity monitoring, Business agility, business process management, California Institute of Technology, Capability Maturity Model Integration, Carnegie-Mellon Software Engineering Institute, chief information officer, Citigroup, Cloud Summit, COBOL, complex event processing, Data Direct, data integration, data management, Dave Linthicum, dave linthicum, David Bressler, David Linthicum, Dion Hinchcliffe, E-Gov, economy, ed horst, Ed Horst, electronic health records, enterprise application integration, enterprise architecture, enterprise decision management, enterprise information integration, enterprise mashups, Enterprise Service Bus, ERP, European Union, federal government, Fiorano, Forrester, Forrester Research, Frank Kenney, FUSE, Gartner, grid computing, Hibernate, hurwitz, IBM, IEEE, Informatica, Information Builders, InterSystems, Intuit, iPhone, iTKO, J2EE, Java EE, JBOWS, Jessica Mola, Joe McKendrick, John Crupi, john favazza, John Reimer, JP Morgenthal, Judith Hurwitz, Keane, Kelly Emo, Key Agility Indicators, Layer 7, legacy modernization modernization, mainframe, mashups, michael kavis, Michael Poulin, mike hammer, miko matsumura, Miko Matsumura, OASIS, Object Management Group, OMG, Oracle, Oracle Fusion Middleware, Peter Schooff, Phil Wainewright, Progress Apama, Progress Software, Progress Software Ed Horst, Randy Heffner, RedMonk, Regev Yativ, REST, SAP, Security Token Service, Service Component Architecture, ServiceMix, soa, SOA, SOA Consortium, soa for dummies, soa governance, SOA governance, SOA in Action, soa in action conference, SOA in Action conference, SOA Manifesto, soa patterns, soa predictions, SOA Software, SOA Symposium, SOAP, social BPM, software ag, Software AG, software as a service, Soumadeep Sen, Spinal Tap, SpringSource, SUPER, supply chain management, System z, Tarak Modi, The Open Group, the open group, TIBCO, US Coast Guard, US Department of Defense, US Navy, WebLayers, WebMethods, Windows, WS-*, WS-Security, WS-Trust, WSO2, Yefim Natis,

Monthly Archives

ADVERTISEMENT