SOA in Action Blog

Joe McKendrick

Five Biggest SOA Governance Mistakes and How to Correct Them

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

Dave Rosenberg, CEO of MuleSource, works with a lot of organizations that are starting their SOA journeys, and noticed that many make the same mistake: they spend all their time worry about the technical details of their implementations, but don't pay enough attention to governance.

In a new post here at ebizQ, Dave outlined what he sees as the five greatest mistakes in SOA governance:

1-Decentralizing common artifacts: "When common artifacts such as WSDLs, schemas or configs are scattered in various locations, organizations waste time searching for interfaces and schemas," Dave says. "This is because they lack a central authority for the published service interface, which discourages discovery and reuse across an enterprise."

2-Reinventing the wheel: Perhaps the biggest problem SOA was meant to correct. "Services and applications are often written again and again to perform the same function," Dave says. "As a result, many different versions of the same artifact are built and integrated, increasing development times and creating a huge maintenance cost burden." The solution is a centralized repository or registry available to the enterprise.

3-Hoping for best practices: "Developers may not inherently know best practices, and even if they do, they may not follow them every time," Dave says. Best practices can and should be enforced as enterprise-wide policies, anywhere from the build to the registry to people and processes.

4-Forgetting about service consumers: It is important to continuously be aware of how a service is being used by the final consumer at the end of the process, Dave says. He recommends adopting tools that track dependency management.

5-Inconsistent application deployment strategy: "Many application deployment strategies are ad-hoc, not well documented, and only understood by one person," Dave says. A registry and repository can help automate developer actions, and thus ensure consistency.

How far along are most organizations with their SOA governance? ebizQ recently conducted a survey on SOA governance trends, and I will be joining Christian Hastedt Marckwardt, solution marketing director with SAP, on Tuesday, April 29, at Noon Eastern Time in a special Webinar to discuss the survey results and implications. Be sure to join us for a compelling hour, as well as receive a complimentary copy of the complete survey results!

______________________________________________________________________

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.ebizq.net/MT4/mt-tb.cgi/11805

Leave a comment

SOA in Action Blog

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an author and independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. View more

Subscribe



Subscribe in Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add ebizQ's SOA in Action Blog to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Add to Google

Recently Commented On

Tag Cloud

Accenture, Active Endpoints, AlignSpace, Amazon Web Services, amazon web services, AmberPoint, Anne Thomas Manes, Apache, Apache Project, Association for Enterprise Information, automated decision making, Bank of America, Brenda Michelson, business activity monitoring, Business agility, business process management, California Institute of Technology, Capability Maturity Model Integration, Carnegie-Mellon Software Engineering Institute, chief information officer, Citigroup, Cloud Summit, COBOL, complex event processing, Data Direct, data integration, data management, Dave Linthicum, dave linthicum, David Bressler, David Linthicum, Dion Hinchcliffe, E-Gov, economy, ed horst, Ed Horst, electronic health records, enterprise application integration, enterprise architecture, enterprise decision management, enterprise information integration, enterprise mashups, Enterprise Service Bus, ERP, European Union, federal government, Fiorano, Forrester, Forrester Research, Frank Kenney, FUSE, Gartner, grid computing, Hibernate, hurwitz, IBM, IEEE, Informatica, Information Builders, InterSystems, Intuit, iPhone, iTKO, J2EE, Java EE, JBOWS, Jessica Mola, Joe McKendrick, John Crupi, john favazza, John Reimer, JP Morgenthal, Judith Hurwitz, Keane, Kelly Emo, Key Agility Indicators, Layer 7, legacy modernization modernization, mainframe, mashups, michael kavis, Michael Poulin, mike hammer, miko matsumura, Miko Matsumura, OASIS, Object Management Group, OMG, Oracle, Oracle Fusion Middleware, Peter Schooff, Phil Wainewright, Progress Apama, Progress Software, Progress Software Ed Horst, Randy Heffner, RedMonk, Regev Yativ, REST, SAP, Security Token Service, Service Component Architecture, ServiceMix, soa, SOA, SOA Consortium, soa for dummies, soa governance, SOA governance, SOA in Action, soa in action conference, SOA in Action conference, SOA Manifesto, soa patterns, soa predictions, SOA Software, SOA Symposium, SOAP, social BPM, software ag, Software AG, software as a service, Soumadeep Sen, Spinal Tap, SpringSource, SUPER, supply chain management, System z, Tarak Modi, The Open Group, the open group, TIBCO, US Coast Guard, US Department of Defense, US Navy, WebLayers, WebMethods, Windows, WS-*, WS-Security, WS-Trust, WSO2, Yefim Natis,

Monthly Archives

ADVERTISEMENT